Blueprint for Change: How Three Code Reforms Will Reshape the Way Virginia Builds

By Staff Writer
Hampton Roads Construction News Network

RICHMOND, Va. — Virginia’s construction and regulatory landscape is entering a defining era. With the 2021 Uniform Statewide Building Code (USBC) now the single enforceable standard for all new permits, the Commonwealth’s builders, architects, and inspectors have crossed a clear threshold. Gone are the days of mixing provisions from older editions; in their place stands a uniform framework demanding both technical precision and code literacy—the ability to interpret and apply the evolving rules that shape the built environment.

This shift is more than procedural. It marks a cultural moment for Virginia’s building community—one that calls for fluency, coordination, and an understanding of why regulation matters as much as how it’s written. Three major reform efforts now underway will test those very skills, redefining how projects are designed, approved, and delivered statewide.

The first centers on Virginia’s single-stair debate, a discussion reshaping how cities balance safety and housing density. Under current code, multifamily buildings in the R-2 occupancy classification may use a single internal stairway only up to three stories. Legislation passed in 2024—Senate Bill 195 and House Bill 368—has directed the Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) to study whether that height limit could safely expand to as many as six stories under enhanced safety measures.

The advisory group assigned to the study includes building officials, fire marshals, architects, and code professionals. Among them is Eric S. Cavallo, founder and chief executive officer of Earthly Infrastructure®, and parent company of HRCNN. As a licensed commercial building contractor and ICC member, Cavallo offers practical perspective on how such a change could influence design logistics, construction sequencing, and emergency response.

Supporters argue that allowing taller single-stair buildings could unlock new housing types, reduce costs, and promote walkable, space-efficient infill—particularly in urban areas constrained by lot size. Opponents caution that any increase must come with expanded fire protection, smoke-control systems, and stricter material requirements to preserve life safety. The deliberations now unfolding will determine whether Virginia joins other jurisdictions experimenting with this model, or holds firm to its existing limit.

While that debate continues, the 2021 USBC is already reshaping the technical backbone of every project. The updated code raises the bar on performance: attic insulation requirements have climbed from R-49 to R-60, most interior lighting must now include dimmers or occupancy sensors, and exterior fixtures require automatic shut-off and moisture protection. For mechanical systems, the rules are just as demanding—all ductwork must undergo verified leakage testing, and ventilation systems must pass performance evaluation before occupancy is granted.

These aren’t optional upgrades; they are built-in expectations. The result is a construction environment that rewards early planning, documentation, and cross-disciplinary coordination. Compliance can no longer wait for the final inspection—it must be embedded from the first drawing to the last punch-list item.

Meanwhile, DHCD is also looking inward—examining how the building process itself can be made more efficient. A second reform initiative is focused on streamlining permits and inspections. Proposals under discussion include concurrent plan reviews, standardized inspection sequences, and clearer documentation requirements for Certificates of Occupancy.

The aim is to reduce administrative lag and bring consistency across Virginia’s jurisdictions without diluting oversight. For contractors and developers alike, those improvements could prove as impactful as any technical code amendment, cutting delays that often stall projects for weeks or months.

Together, these three efforts—egress reform, performance enhancement, and process modernization—form a convergence of change that demands close attention from every corner of the industry. The grace period for the 2018 USBC has expired, and the 2021 edition now governs every permit, review, and inspection. In this environment, code literacy is more than a professional credential; it is a business necessity. Those who understand the intent and application of each provision will be the ones who keep schedules intact, control costs, and ensure public safety in the process.

The message is clear: the rules are evolving, and Virginia’s builders must evolve with them. The industry’s future belongs to those who adapt early, advocate responsibly, and build with both precision and purpose.

About HRCNN

The Hampton Roads Construction News Network (HRCNN) is Virginia’s independent source for news and analysis on construction, zoning, infrastructure, and regulatory development. Founded under Earthly Infrastructure®, HRCNN provides clear, fact-based coverage for contractors, developers, inspectors, and policymakers across the Commonwealth. By tracking DHCD advisory activity, code-cycle reforms, and enforcement trends, HRCNN helps ensure that the region’s building community stays informed, prepared, and committed to a safer, smarter built environment—one that keeps Virginia built safe and built strong.

Balancing Safety and Infill: Virginia Reexamines Single-Stair Design Standards

By HRCNN Staff Writer
June 24, 2025 | Richmond, VA

In a pivotal meeting that could influence how future housing is built across the Commonwealth, Virginia’s Department of Housing and Community Development (DHCD) convened a diverse advisory group this week to evaluate a controversial building code proposal: whether to allow four-story multifamily buildings to be constructed with a single interior exit stairway.

The discussion centered on Proposal B1006.3.4-24, which seeks to extend the current allowance for single-exit stair buildings—currently capped at three stories—to include a fourth story, provided that enhanced safety measures are integrated. Supporters argue that the change would unlock dense urban infill development on constrained lots, improve building efficiency, and align Virginia with emerging national model codes. Opponents, however, caution that removing a second stairwell could introduce unacceptable life safety risks, especially in rural areas.

“The goal isn’t to remove stairs for cost savings,” one advisory group member said. “It’s about allowing more flexible, climate-adaptable designs on small sites, with bedrooms on exterior walls and more access to natural light.”

The proposal mirrors recent language approved by the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) and submitted for consideration in the 2027 International Building Code (IBC) update. However, Virginia is not bound by either framework and must decide whether to adopt an independent provision. The June 24 meeting marked the first formal effort to gather input from fire officials, architects, engineers, local government staff, planners, and other industry stakeholders.

Design and Energy Considerations

Much of the early discussion focused on the design benefits of single-stair buildings. Advocates noted that the reduction of internal corridors allows for more efficient layouts and better cross-ventilation. Architects in the room pointed out that long, deep units with limited window exposure are more energy-intensive and less desirable for residents. They also cited increased flexibility in mechanical system design and solar orientation.

However, some code officials raised concerns about energy-code compliance, especially related to window-to-wall ratios and thermal performance. While most participants agreed that energy issues could be addressed through design choices, others emphasized the need for clear language to prevent misinterpretation during enforcement.

Fire and Life Safety Remain the Primary Concern

As the conversation shifted, fire service professionals voiced strong reservations. Several attendees noted that in jurisdictions with limited fire coverage—particularly in rural parts of Southwest Virginia—response times can exceed 15 minutes, making the presence of a second exit stair critical to resident survival during emergencies.

“New York and Seattle may show low fatality rates in single-exit buildings, but they have response times under four minutes and deep suppression capacity,” one member said. “We can’t design Virginia code around those standards.”

The concern was not only about egress time, but also about operational conflict—residents attempting to evacuate through the same stairwell that fire personnel need to access for response. The discussion included standpipe requirements, positive pressure ventilation, and notification systems. Several participants emphasized the importance of clear mandates for manual fire alarms and early alert systems, especially in buildings that may lack a second means of egress.

Proposed Revisions Emerge

Despite the disagreement, the group found some common ground. By the end of the meeting, there was general consensus on limiting the proposal strictly to interior stairwells, excluding exterior stairs for now due to additional vulnerabilities. The group also discussed amendments requiring stairwell doors to open in the direction of travel, prohibiting direct access from dwelling units into exit stairs, and revising language to align occupancy calculations with gross floor area rather than net area to avoid enforcement conflicts.

Emergency escape and rescue openings (EEROs), which are required in three-story buildings under the current code, were flagged for inclusion in any revised four-story provision. Participants also urged consistency with existing IBC and Virginia Construction Code requirements, including clarifications on notification system connectivity and sprinkler integration.

What’s Next

DHCD staff indicated that they would work with the code change proponent and fire service representatives to draft a revised proposal. A second review and consensus process will be conducted via email, with a virtual meeting to follow if necessary. The revised language is expected to be narrower in scope, more technically precise, and focused on conditions that reflect Virginia’s unique fire service landscape.

As Virginia continues to wrestle with affordability, density, and safety in housing policy, the single-stair proposal offers a case study in balancing innovation with public protection. Whether the compromise will satisfy both sides remains to be seen.

HRCNN will continue to report on code reform efforts and land use policy shaping Virginia’s built environment.
Submit commentary or article ideas at: https://earthlyinfrastructure.com/hrcnn-submit-article